What you'll learn in this article
  • The 12 items to confirm before publishing an FX affiliate article, organized in this order: search intent, fact-checking, compliance, E-E-A-T, and technical
  • Where to look in the Premiums & Representations Act, the stealth-marketing rules, and the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, from an article-review perspective (talking about earnings always assumes results vary and are not guaranteed)
  • How to prevent oversights systematically with a "pre-publish checklist" you can copy and reuse every time

Key points of this article: frequently asked questions

Q: What is the minimum you should check before publishing an FX affiliate article?
A: The minimum is these four: fact-checking (sources for numbers and conditions), compliance (the Premiums & Representations Act, the stealth-marketing rules, and the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act), the presence of a PR disclosure, and broken links plus the correct referral link. Because this is a finance (YMYL) genre, avoid exaggerated claims and definitive earnings promises, and clearly state that results vary by individual and are not guaranteed.
Q: Is a PR disclosure always required on an affiliate article?
A: When you introduce something based on a relationship with an advertiser, you need a label that lets consumers recognize it as advertising (PR, advertisement, and so on). The stealth-marketing rules (a designated notice under the Premiums & Representations Act) that took effect on October 1, 2023 prohibit displays that make it hard to tell something is an ad as deceptive representations. For articles with affiliate links, it is safest to place the PR disclosure somewhere easy to see, such as near the top of the page.
Read this article as slides (9)
Please read first (no guarantee / results vary)

This article is informational content summarizing how to review the quality and compliance of an FX affiliate article before publishing. Using the checklist will not necessarily raise your rankings or earnings. Affiliate results vary by individual, and no amount of earnings is guaranteed. Also, because the services introduced are FX/investment services, please communicate on the premise that investing carries a risk of loss for readers. For the final interpretation of any law, give priority to primary sources such as the Consumer Affairs Agency and the Financial Services Agency, or to confirmation by experts.

Why turn the "pre-publish check" into a system

Right after finishing an article, anyone wants to publish it quickly. But the articles published on momentum, just after writing, are exactly the ones where small mistakes turn up later. A missing source for a number, a broken link, an accidental "you're guaranteed to earn"—all of these could have been prevented in the few minutes before publishing.

The FX/investment genre in particular falls into what Google calls YMYL (Your Money or Your Life)—an area that can affect a person's money or life. The search quality rater guidelines say that in fields like this, the bar for E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) is applied more strictly, with trustworthiness positioned as an indispensable element. In other words, articles that are "thin," "without sources," or "exaggerated" tend to be at a disadvantage in evaluation as well.

That is exactly why, rather than relying on your feel each time, we recommend running the same check as a system. Below, we explain the 12 items to look at before publishing, divided into five groups. At the end, we sum them up in a list format you can copy and use as is.

Viewing the 12 items in 5 groups
  • A. Search intent and title (items 1–2): Are you answering the reader's question?
  • B. Fact-checking and sources (items 3–4): Are the numbers and conditions backed up?
  • C. Compliance (items 5–8): Premiums & Representations Act, stealth marketing, Financial Instruments Act, PR disclosure
  • D. E-E-A-T and readability (items 9–10): Who wrote it, and on what basis?
  • E. Links and technical (items 11–12): Links, display, structured data

A. Search intent and title (items 1–2)

The first group is the foundation of the article. No matter how carefully you write, if it is off from the answer the reader was looking for, they leave.

1
Are you fully answering the search intent? Confirm that the article opening touches on "what the person searching your target keyword really wants to know." For example, are you explaining only how to register to someone who arrived via "OlympTrade withdrawal not working"? Conclusion first, details after—check that this order hasn't broken down.
2
Do the title and content match? Confirm that what the title promised ("12 items," "thorough comparison," and so on) is delivered in the body. A "clickbait title" that only baits clicks without matching content lowers time on page and, in the long run, hurts your evaluation. If you put a number in, always make it match the count in the body.

This group is essentially a check of "whether you've kept your promise to the reader." Because writers know the content, they tend to rush the explanation; rereading from the perspective of a first-time reader makes it easier to notice gaps.

B. Fact-checking and sources (items 3–4)

The place where accidents happen most easily in FX affiliate work is this fact-checking. Numbers like spreads, minimum deposits, withdrawal times, and reward conditions change at the service's discretion. Posting them with outdated information disadvantages readers and costs you trust.

3
Do the numbers and conditions have sources? For every number in the article (amounts, rates, days, campaign conditions, and so on), get to a state where you can say "where I confirmed it." Ideally an official site or primary source. Noting the date you checked makes it easier to update later. As a final step, comb through once more for any numbers written from memory or a vague recollection.
4
Have you added an "as of" note to information that goes stale easily? For numbers that change often, add "as of June 2026" or "please check the latest on the official site." For example, based on public information, Kingfin's rewards are said to be a CPA capped at $250 and a tiered RevShare (roughly 20% at the start up to a maximum of 80%), paid daily, with a $10 minimum—but since these conditions may also change in the future, it is safest to not be too definitive and to prompt readers to confirm.
A mini procedure for fact-checking

(1) Pick out every number in the article, as if underlining each one → (2) Cross-check each one against an official or primary source → (3) For anything you can't confirm, replace it with "please check the official site" or delete it. Making these three steps a habit can substantially reduce publishing misinformation. Especially when you have AI write a draft, don't take numbers at face value—always verify them with human eyes.

C. Compliance (items 5–8)

This is where you need to be most careful when communicating in the finance genre. It may look a bit detailed, but because this is an area where an unwitting violation can be irreversible, we'll check it item by item. Note that the following is a general overview; for final judgments, give priority to primary sources or confirmation by experts.

5
Are there exaggerated or definitive claims (Premiums & Representations Act)? Definitive or exaggerated expressions such as "you're guaranteed to earn," "you'll never lose," or "rewards just for waiting" may run afoul of the Premiums & Representations Act (misleading representations of superiority or advantage). If you touch on earnings, always add "results vary by individual, and the amount is not guaranteed."
6
Does it satisfy the perspective of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act? Article 37 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act prohibits false statements and exaggerated advertising. Offering a conclusive judgment such as "you're sure to profit" regarding price movements is also prohibited. Likewise, presenting your own evaluation, or that of someone you commissioned (an affiliate, etc.), as if it were an objective third-party evaluation is treated as problematic. In a review article, honestly indicate that it is "your own impression."
7
Is there a PR disclosure (stealth-marketing rules)? Under the so-called stealth-marketing rules that took effect on October 1, 2023, a display that makes it hard to tell something is an ad is prohibited as a deceptive representation under the Premiums & Representations Act. For articles that introduce something based on a relationship with an advertiser, place a label such as "PR" or "advertisement" somewhere easy to see, like near the top of the page. Avoid quietly pasting only the link.
8
Are testimonials or results "pretending to be real"? If you include reviews, testimonials, or earnings results, and they are a model case (simulation), always state so clearly. Making a fictional person's "I earn ¥X a month with this" look like a real voice is a high-risk act of stealth marketing or exaggerated representation. If you present figures, add that it is an estimate.
NG expressions you must eliminate before publishing
  • Definitive claims like "you're guaranteed to earn," "anyone can," "no risk," "you'll never lose"
  • Expressions that mislead readers into thinking they'll earn without effort, like "just wait" or "totally hands-off"
  • Superlatives with no basis, like "No.1" or "the best in the industry"
  • Testimonials or earnings screenshots pretending to be real (state clearly if it's a model case)

Reading these alongside our site's guide to the stealth-marketing rules and the Premiums & Representations Act and our collection of rewrites for NG expressions will expand your toolkit of alternative phrasings. Having "a stock of rewrites" ready at the checking stage makes corrections smoother.

D. E-E-A-T and readability (items 9–10)

Even with the same information, an article that conveys "who wrote it, and with what experience and basis" earns trust. Google says it weighs E-E-A-T more heavily in YMYL fields, and even when you use AI to draft, it is preferable to have expert confirmation, accountability from a named writer, and original insight.

9
Are the writer and first-hand experience visible? Confirm whether the author information (operator, editor) is clear, and whether it includes actual dashboard screenshots or "things I learned by trying it myself." An article that merely summarizes steps doesn't stand out from other sites. First-hand experience is the biggest difference from a copy-paste article.
10
Is readability in order? Can readers skim via the headings, are individual paragraphs not too long, and are technical terms explained? Use tables, bullet points, and summary boxes to lower the "reading burden." Since many people read on a smartphone, preview it once on a phone screen to check for cramped text or broken line breaks.

Write about what you introduce only after seeing it with your own eyes

The persuasiveness of reviews and comparison articles comes from first-hand experience. Registering as a Kingfin affiliate is free, with no inventory and no upfront capital. Writing after actually seeing the difference between CPA and RevShare and the dashboard also makes it easier to pass your checks. Results and amounts are not guaranteed.

Sign up free
There is no cost whatsoever / results and amounts are not guaranteed

Last is the technical area, which directly leads to "lost opportunities" if overlooked. Even a great article won't lead to results if a link is broken or the referral link is wrong.

11
Are the links and referral link correct? Confirm that all links in the body open (no broken links or 404s), and that the referral link is your own correct tracking link. It's courteous to add rel="sponsored noopener" to external/ad links and set them to open in a new tab. Placing CTAs not only once at the end but also at natural spots—right after the intro, mid-body, and in the conclusion—reduces missed opportunities.
12
Are the display, structured data, and meta information in order? Confirm that the title, description, and OGP image are set, that images have alt (alternative text), and that structured data such as FAQs (JSON-LD) isn't broken. Alt text should basically be "a concise description that fits the context," around 80–125 characters as a guide, and you should avoid keyword stuffing, blanks, or reuse. Google also uses alt as a clue for image search.
Tips for writing alt (alternative text)
  • Say specifically what the image is (e.g., "screenshot of the OlympTrade withdrawal request screen")
  • For purely decorative images, leave the alt empty (alt="") to exclude them from screen readers
  • Don't reuse the same alt or list out keywords (it's counterproductive for both SEO and accessibility)

A pre-publish checklist you can use as is (12 items)

Finally, here it is in a form you can copy and use every time. When you finish writing an article, go top to bottom and confirm you can say "yes" to each. If even one trips you up, fix it before publishing.

1 Search intent: The opening answers the question of the person who arrived via the target keyword
2 Title match: The body delivers the title's promise (numbers, content)
3 Sources: Every number and condition has a confirmation source (ideally official)
4 "As of" notes: Added "as of [year/month] / confirm on the official site" to changeable info
5 Premiums & Representations Act: No definitive/exaggerated claims like "guaranteed to earn" / states results vary and aren't guaranteed
6 Financial Instruments Act: No offering of conclusive judgments / impressions not disguised as objective evaluation
7 PR disclosure: A "PR/advertisement" label is in an easy-to-see spot (affiliate links present)
8 Testimonials: Not pretending to be real / model cases clearly marked as "simulation"
9 E-E-A-T: The writer and first-hand experience (screenshots, impressions) are visible
10 Readability: Skimmable via headings and bullets / smartphone display checked
11 Links: No broken links / referral link correct / rel and new-tab settings
12 Technical: Title, description, OGP, image alt, and structured data are all in order

Once you get used to it, you can run this list in a few minutes per article. It may take time at first, but the habit of not treating "published" as the finish line is, in the end, the fastest route. Note that passing the check does not guarantee rankings or earnings. Affiliate results vary by individual, and the amount you can earn is not guaranteed—please don't forget this premise to the very end.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the minimum you should check before publishing an FX affiliate article?
At a minimum, cover these four: fact-checking (sources for numbers and conditions), compliance (the Premiums & Representations Act, the stealth-marketing rules, and the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act), the presence of a PR disclosure, and broken links plus the correct referral link. Finance is a YMYL genre in particular, so you need to avoid exaggerated claims and definitive earnings promises, and clearly state that results vary by individual and are not guaranteed. It is safer to confirm all of this in one pass before publishing than to fix it afterward.
Is a PR (advertising) disclosure always required on an affiliate article?
When you introduce a product or service based on a relationship with an advertiser, you need a label that lets consumers recognize it as advertising (PR, advertisement, promotion, and so on). Under Japan's so-called stealth-marketing rules (a designated notice under the Premiums & Representations Act) that took effect on October 1, 2023, any display that makes it hard to tell something is an ad is prohibited as a deceptive representation. For articles that contain affiliate links, it is safest to place the PR disclosure somewhere easy to see, such as near the top of the page.
If I don't write "you're guaranteed to earn," is it fine to talk about earnings?
Touching on earnings is not prohibited in itself, but how you write it matters. Definitive or exaggerated claims like "you're guaranteed to earn" or "no risk" may run afoul of the Premiums & Representations Act or the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. If you present figures or a model case, also state clearly that it is a simulation (an estimate), that results vary by individual and are not guaranteed, and that the FX/investment service being introduced carries a risk of loss.
Is the same check fine for an article drafted with AI?
The basic checks are the same, but for AI drafts, perform "fact-checking" especially strictly. Because AI sometimes writes plausible-looking but nonexistent numbers or conditions, verify every amount, rate, number of days, and so on against official or primary sources. In addition, confirmation by a named writer plus your own first-hand experience and original perspective are especially important in YMYL fields. Passing the check still does not guarantee results; outcomes vary by individual, and the amount is not guaranteed.

[Disclaimer] This article is informational and educational content by the Kingfin English Editorial Team. The explanations of laws (the Premiums & Representations Act, the so-called stealth-marketing rules, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, etc.) and of Google's evaluation are an overview based on generally available information at the time of writing, and do not guarantee their application to individual cases or any final interpretation. For practical judgments, give priority to primary sources such as the Consumer Affairs Agency and the Financial Services Agency, or to confirmation by lawyers and other experts. Using the checklist in this article does not guarantee higher search rankings or affiliate earnings; results vary by individual, and the amount you can earn is not guaranteed. The services introduced through Kingfin's affiliate program are FX/investment-related services, and investing carries a risk of loss. We do not, and should not, use expressions such as "guaranteed to earn" or "no risk."

Hiro Hiraki
Author
Hiro Hiraki
Editor-in-chief of Kingfin JP. An FX affiliate specialist with over 15 years in finance and FinTech translation. Trilingual in Japanese, English and Thai.